We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
No cookies to display.
I found a fascinating insight buried in a Field Service survey from 2020 [1].
250 industry professionals—technicians and executives alike, from small to enterprise-size businesses—were polled to do a “pulse check” on the industry.
The very last question was:
“How much time does each field technician spend on managing/administering work orders vs actually performing the work?”
And this is what I found fascinating:
About 33 percent of the managers said their techs spend 15-30 minutes on admin work per day while 19 percent of the technicians themselves answered in the same 15-30 minute range.
So, techs doing “a little bit” of admin work were almost half of what managers thought.
Furthermore:
About 7 percent of the managers said their techs spend more than 2 hours on admin work while almost 16 percent of the techs themselves answered in the same 2-hour range.
So, techs doing A LOT of admin work were more than twice what managers thought.
This means that executives looking into productivity numbers are up for an unpleasant surprise:
“I thought my guys were only spending ‘this’ much on admin work, but they’re spending THAT much per day?!”
This disconnect between what managers think versus what technicians actually do means that many of them are over-optimistic when it comes to their technicians’ productivity.
And in an industry where TIME literally is money, this disconnect is probably creating a big gap between revenue forecasts versus actual revenue…
And causing a big profit leak in their business.
Since the beginning of this year, we’ve been running a Remote Technician Support pilot program with an industry giant with the goal of reducing the number of hours their techs spend doing admin work. In this article, I’m going to share with you our experience running this team, the lessons learned, and what the future holds for this innovation.
While there’s a wide range of use-cases for a Remote Technician Support program, here are the two we’re currently developing:
This directly addresses the issue of having techs spend time doing admin work and offloading these tasks to a specialized remote team.
For one of our partners, we deployed four remote technicians in the Philippines—each of them with over ten years of experience—to support their U.S. counterparts remotely. They take most of the admin work off of the field technicians’ plate in a way that typical administrative staff wouldn’t be able to. They look at manuals, blueprints, search for parts in their inventory and across the web, and place orders.
By doing this, the field technician shaves off hours of admin work every day and becomes instantly more productive. If a certain tech was only able to complete three or four work orders (and do admin work for a couple of hours), maybe now he or she can complete a fifth work order.
This might seem like a small improvement but at scale, it really means that the business gets 20 percent of added service capacity without hiring more technicians.
For context, the remote tech support agents are working full time. That means saving field technicians 36 hours per day. Multiply it by the standard hourly rate of $100 and you’re potentially getting over $108,000 per month of extra revenue capacity that costs a fraction of that.
As the remote tech support infrastructure is in place, it will become clear that there are ways to further optimise technicians’ productivity.
Remote troubleshooting is a perfect way to leverage your “super techs”. The current state of technology is allowing truly mind-blowing interactions. A junior technician on-site and a senior technician hundreds of miles away just need an iPad to virtually work together, side by side.
The on-site tech can show his remote support agent what he is actually seeing, and the remote technician can “operate” as if it were with his or her own hands and show the junior technician exactly what to hold, what to twist, and how.
These kinds of interactions get technicians unstuck faster, increase first-time fix rates, achieve faster resolution time, and reduce the number of truck rolls needed to get the job done. Not only that, your Remote Support Technicians can diagnose and troubleshoot equipment ahead of dispatch, which helps in sending the right technician with the right parts for the right job every time.